![]() “The first and most effective way to secure data from leaks and hacks is not to generate excessive data in the first place,” said Jacob Van Dehy, a public speaker during the meeting. Many of the attendees at Thursday’s meeting said they did not trust police with the technology and that it was an invasion of privacy. Other board members, whose specialties vary from technology to privacy to legal scholarship, questioned the constitutionality of such a program, how the data would be stored and what future plans might be in store for a technology that has these capabilities, such as facial recognition. “I just feel like there’s not too many outstanding questions but the potential for what this can do hasn’t been explored enough,” Anyanetu said. “And, as a sociologist, I can tell you that discretion leads to discrimination.”īoard Chair Ike Anyanetu said the board should use the the coming months to make a decision and get more opinions on the program. “We heard today that the police can use this technology for investigative purposes, so police get a lot of discretion,” said board member Cid Martinez, one of the advisory board members. Of the 394 comments left on the online recording of one of the meetings, 324 were opposed to the program.Īfter Sharki’s presentation at City Hall on Thursday, the board members asked questions about the program and some of them echoed the public speakers’ privacy concerns. The comments largely skewed against the program at two of the meetings held in Mission Valley and Mountain View on March 8 and March 9, respectively. But many had concerns over privacy, over-policing in communities of color and how the information would be stored and collected. Some residents at the in-person meetings supported the idea, saying the high-tech streetlights could help police solve or prevent serious crimes. Attendees asked police questions about the program and a video of one of the meetings was posted online. Police presented the plan last month during nine community meetings - one for each council district - at various locations across the city. The data would be stored in a secure area with access restricted to authorized investigators, Sharki said. The cameras would also constantly record, allowing police to use video evidence in violent crime investigations, Sharki said. ![]() Adam Sharki told the board during the presentation that the new technology would allow police to capture license plate numbers in search of stolen or wanted vehicles. ![]() But the community will get to weigh in first. city to use cameras and plate readers as part of a single network. Public Safety San Diego police want to add surveillance tech: 500 streetlight cameras plus license plate readers ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |